The Emperors Club Reflection Paper - 1516 Words

Reflection Paper 1 Dec. 5, 2012 Thesis: Past is both past and not past. How we perceive and act in the future is completely up to us. If I was asked to describe studying history, all I can say is one word, Dà ©jà   vu. Dà ©jà   vu is a French word meaning â€Å"already seen†. This phenomenon strikes when an occurrence you are currently experiencing seemed to have occurred in the past. It is that moment when an event flashes back right in front you and you seem to know what was going to happen next. However, not everything that happen turns out to be â€Å"picture-perfect† the way you knew it before. The occurrence in your head is very similar to what is happening but not the exact same thing because, as science would explain it, our brain does†¦show more content†¦Hundert and that should’ve been enough for him to learn from his mistakes. But he didn’t. He cheated once, but that didn’t made him realized that it was bad. Moreover, it has influenced him to cheat once again. Choosing to go with the path of cheating instead of going against the mistakes was his choice. And no one should be blamed for what he did but himself. How we perceive and act in the future is completely up to us. We are liable to the consequence of perceptions and actions that we make. These consequences, may it be good or bad, becomes our future. No one can see the future. And there are infinitely many possibilities of that could happen to us. But then again no one can determine nor control what will happen to the future. Yet there is only one who can decide for your own future, no one else but you. We have the freedom to do anything we want. And there’s no one holding us back. Though we always have these options, there are also responsibilities attached to this freedom. Whatever happens, each of our own future certainly depends on no one else but our own. Mr. Hundert was telling the two things he was certain of at the first part of the film. One of this was, â€Å"A man’s character is his fate.† The way we think, the way we choose to do what’s right or wrong, the way we live our life directs us to the path where we decide to go. And the character we build up on this decisions make up the future, the future that is determined by us. When Mr. HundertShow MoreRelatedA001426205 Bellamy Charles STMK Essay2945 Words   |  12 Pagesdeadline? ASSESSMENT SHEET (to be completed by the examiner) Student name: Course name: Subject name: COMMENTS Principles used (for example, number and understanding of concepts referred to, their influence on the structure of this paper, number and correct citations of  references, use of appropriate jargon)      /4 Application of those principles, that is, the  analysis and evaluation of the example problem based on the principles, including the final recommendations and their justificationRead MoreManagement and Mcd2040 Managing People6266 Words   |  26 Pagesmanagement functions. †¢ Describe the three steps in the control process. †¢ Explain how organisational performance is measured. †¢ Understand tools used to measure organisational performance. †¢ Discuss contemporary issues in control Topic 12 Review and reflection †¢ No new theory is introduced and the purpose of this week is for you to check your progress against the overall aims of the unit. Students should note that the program outlined above is a guide to the material to be covered in this unit and notRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagessociology. I. Duberley, Joanne. II. Johnson, Phil, 1955III. Title. HM786.M33 2007 302.3’5—dc22 2006022347 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 0 9 08 07 06 Typeset in 10/12.5 pt sabon by 72 Printed by Ashford Colour Press Ltd., Gosport The publisher’s policy is to use paper manufactured from sustainable forests. . Brief Contents Preface List of figures List of tables Acknowledgements xiii xvii xix xx 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Introducing organization theory: what is it, and why does it matter? ModernistRead MoreEssay on Fall of Asclepius95354 Words   |  382 Pagesmuch as Thomas. His hair was a dark red colour from a botched dying job. Both of them had rather pale skin. Yeah, Lucas replied with enthusiasm. Just like the supplier said, they are completely authentic. They are also sharpened. Let a piece of paper fall on it and it will split into two. Have you tested to see how tough it is at cutting solid objects yet? Costing a few thousand for each sword, I rather not. It was hard enough to get these blades. You have to be a very good friend with

One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest Literary Analysis

Freedom can be obtained through the defiance of society’s expectations to find a sense of individuality. Ken Kesey’s ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’ is a novel originally published in 1962, which centres on the lives of patients in a psychiatric hospital. Symbolism, one of the many techniques, was incorporated into the novel, to convey the main ideas of freedom, and society versus individual. Motifs and symbols are vaguely different, in a sense that motifs are symbols unique to the novel, whereas symbols are universal; however motifs can be considered as symbols as it also represents the ideas of Kesey’s novel. Kesey’s portrayal of the idea of freedom through the characters’ beliefs of their personal situation shows the reader the†¦show more content†¦The cuckoo’s nest in this case symbolises the ward, and McMurphy and Bromden are the men liberating themselves as they â€Å"flew over†. Although both men â€Å"flew over the cuckoo’s nest†, their pathways were different; Bromden escaped the ward alive, while McMurphy escaped the Combine’s possession. The symbolisation of the nest shows how freedom can have various meanings for different individuals. In the psychiatric ward, laughter is uncommon between the patients, so when McMurphy arrives and laughs despite â€Å"nothing funny going on†(11), the men are â€Å"stunned dumb by him† (11). McMurphy’s laughter is â€Å"free and loud† (11), and before his arrival â€Å"nobody ever dared to let loose and laugh† (13). Laughter symbolises freedom as it allows the men to express themselves, regardless of their imprisonment of the ward. ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’ conveys the idea of society versus individual by setting the story in a psychiatric ward, where the â€Å"Combine† (8) represents society, and the individuals are the patients. Prior to the arrival of McMurphy, the other men were oblivious to their unjust treatment, and their ability to rebel against Big Nurse Ratched. Society versus individual as a main idea represents society’s pressure on the patients to conform to norms and the consequences of not doing so. The mechanised society, which Bromden refers to as the Combine, is a motif that symbolises the suppression of individuality to obtainShow MoreRelatedOne Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest Literary Analysis972 Words   |  4 PagesOne Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest is a novel written by American author Ken Kesey, and set inside a psychiatric hospital. The story is narrated by ‘Chief’ Bromden, and unravels the events leading to McMurphy’s rebellion against Nurse Ratched in order to achieve his long-term goal of ‘freeing’ the inmates. Throughout the novel, Kesey introduces a number of ideas to the reader such as the oppressive nature of authority and society’s inability to accept difference. By using literary devices such as characterizationRead MoreThe One Who Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest Literary Analysis1046 Words   |  5 Pagesof literature have comparable characteristics, including the use of literary elements to portray deeper meaning. â€Å"T he Story of an Hour† and The One Who Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest are great pieces of literature which keep their main focus around the use of symbolism, hidden in the plot. Whereas Mrs. Mallard, from â€Å"The Story of an Hour†, appears to be insane due to her husband, characters from The One Who Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest gains their insanity from Nurse Ratched, both authors incorporate symbolismRead MoreOne Flew Over A Cuckoos Nest And Girl Interrupted Literary Analysis1862 Words   |  8 Pagesplatform of literature has two different windows. The first being the depiction of the author and the second being the interpretation of the audience. This concept is evident within both works this essay seeks to explore. In Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over a Cuckoo’s Nest, a charismatic criminal, Randle P. McMurphy is admitted to a state asylum due to his will of serving out of prison sentence in a mental hospital rather than the penitentiary. McMurphy b rings in the outside world to the admitted patientsRead MoreComparison of Two Texts, â€Å"One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest† and â€Å"to Kill a Mocking Bird†1914 Words   |  8 PagesComparison of two texts, â€Å"One flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest† and â€Å"To Kill a Mocking Bird† | How do the authors of To Kill a Mockingbird and One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest use literary techniques to explore the concepts of isolation? Isolation and courage in the form of racism and discrimination is an analogous concept explored in Harper Lee’s novel To Kill a Mockingbird and Ken Kesey’s novel One flew over the cuckoo’s nest. The authors exemplify the conflicts of isolation displayed by theRead MoreKen Kesey s One Flew Over The Cuckoo s Nest1629 Words   |  7 PagesKesey’s One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest is a timeless classic. This novel has been subject to analysis through many different literary lenses: feminist, Marxist, and of course, psychoanalytic. One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest provides a plethora of evidence when it comes to using the psychoanalytic lens. The lens in question deals with the teaching of Sigmund Freud. When reading this novel, the audience sees quite clearly that the world of psychology plays an impactful role in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’sRead MoreOne Flew over the Cuckoos Nest Research Paper1764 Words   |  8 PagesDrugs and Insanity Ag ainst Society The author of the novel One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest, Ken Keasey, received his inspiration for the book while volunteering at a veterans hospital. This is where he was first introduced to LSD. The moment he tried it, he became addicted, and began experimenting on himself with the drugs, observing the effects. The novel deals with the tyrannical rule of head Nurse Ratched in a mental hospital somewhere in Oregon. She runs all business and daily life in the asylumRead MoreOne Flew over the Cuckoos Nest: the Power of Laughter1592 Words   |  7 Pagesgreater authority has the power to deny a person of their laughter; which, inevitably, denies him of his freedom. Ken Kesey conveys the idea that laughter and freedom go hand in hand throughout his novel One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest. Kesey portrays laughter as a parallel to freedom through various literary symbols and imagery in order to illustrate how the power of laughter can free a man who is under the control of an unjust authority. Through the characterization of Nurse Ratched and McMurphy, KeseyRead MoreLiterary Analysis over One Flew over the Cuckoos Nest Essay1401 Words   |  6 PagesLITERARY ANALYSIS One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is a novel written by Ken Kesey during a time in our society when pressures of our modern world seemed at their greatest. Many people were, at this time, deemed by society’s standards to be insane and institutionalized. One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is set in a ward of a mental institution. The major conflict in the novel is that of power. Power is a recurring and overwhelming theme throughout the novel. Kesey shows the power of womenRead MoreAnalysis Of Chief Bromden s The Of One Flew Over The Cuckoo s Nest 952 Words   |  4 Pagesthe end of the Novel, the resolution was Chief Bromden had escaped from the mental hospital. It affected the mental hospital because many patients were happy he escaped from Nurse Ratched authority. Character Analysis: Chief Bromden - The narrator/patient of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Chief Bromden is the son of the chief of the Columbia Indians and a white woman. Also, He suffers from paranoia and hallucinations, and received several electroshock treatments for ten years. In the novel, ChiefRead MoreSanity Like One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest1905 Words   |  8 Pages1960’s to the late 1970’s, the concept and interest of mental illness has been studied and discussed in countless different mediums ranging from films that tackled issues of sanity like One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest to novels that dealt with much darker issues such as schizophrenia in Flora Schreiber’s Sybil. One of the most controversial and talked about productions of the 20th century is Peter Shaffer’s 1974 Tony winning play, Equus, which recounts Dr. Martin Dysart’s encounter and treatment of

How does Shakespeare create tension in the trial scene of the Merchant of Venice Essay Example For Students

How does Shakespeare create tension in the trial scene of the Merchant of Venice Essay The Merchant of Venice is a play by Shakespeare set in Venice in 1592; at this time the English looked up to Venetians and they were seen as very fashionable people. Venice was also the trading capital of the world as there was an increase in overseas trade and merchants became very well respected. At the time the attitude towards Jews was hostile and they were treated very badly, there was a lot of prejudice against Jews. They were seen as criminals as some Jews committed usury and they were looked down on by Christians. The play has been set in Venice as it is about a Jewish usurer called Shylock; he is seeking revenge on a wealthy Christian Merchant called Antonio and by setting it in Venice the audience are more likely to sympathise with Antonio and see Shylock as the evil one as he is a Jewish usurer. Within my essay I will be exploring and analysing the techniques Shakespeare uses in the trial scene of his play, The Merchant of Venice, to create and build up dramatic tension for the audience. The main plot of The Merchant of Venice is that Antonio agrees to an extreme bond; if the loan of 3000 ducats is not paid back to Shylock within the deadline Shylock can claim a pound of Antonios flesh. Shylock describes the bond: an equal pound of your fair flesh, to be cut off and taken in what part of your body pleaseth me. Antonio agrees to the bond: Content, in faith; Ill seal to such a bond Unfortunately, all of his ships are shipwrecked so he is unable to pay back the money to Shylock. Consequently, Shylock is seeking revenge on Antonio as he has been mistreated his whole life as he is a Jew and therefore he becomes inhumane with the power and control he seems to have when he becomes obsessed with taking revenge as he has this bond against Antonio. The subplot of The Merchant of Venice is focused on romance as Bassanio and Portia fall in love as he wins her in a lottery (a choice of three chests one of them allowing them to be married) created by her father. The romance between Bassanio and Portia gives a slight relief to the tension created between Shylock and Antonio and it lightens the tone of the play distracting the audience away from the obsessive and hostile atmosphere they create. In the end the lovers have a happy, playful ending which leaves Antonio alive but alone and Shylock is punished mercilessly by Portia as he has to live the rest of his life in pain. The trial scene is the climax of the play, Shylock is becoming obsessed with the reality of taking revenge on Antonio: The pound of flesh, which I demand of him, is dearly brought, tis mine, and I will have it Shylock is becoming extremely impatient for his bond and he is set on taking his revenge, he is showing no mercy. In the trial scene Antonio is preparing to die: I am armed and well prepared. Give me your hand, Bassanio, fare you well! As Antonio is expecting the worst it creates dramatic tension as the audience feel the hopeless situation that Antonio is in and are willing the events of the trial to turn in his favour. Shakespeare cleverly builds up the tension, and creates suspense in the scene to keep the audience on edge. During the trial scene the drama and irony is added with the disguise of Nerissa and Portia as they change the direction of the trial, as the events turn in Antonios favour. Shakespeare begins the build up of dramatic tension in the opening of the court scene with the introductory speeches. When the Duke talks about Shylock he presents him as an inhumane man with a cold heart and no mercy. He describes Shylock A stony adversary Uncapable of pity, void and empty from any dram of mercy. This implies that he feel thats shylock has no feelings and that he sees him as an opponent with not even a little bit of mercy. This creates some tension as we are reminded of Shylocks unwavering, remorseless character. Shakespeare also uses Antonio to create dramatic tension in the beginning of the court scene when he presents himself. He says His rigorous course; but since he stands obdurate, and that no lawful means that can carry me out of his envys reach, I do oppose my patience to his fury when Antonio says this it conveys the sense that he is preparing himself for the worst and he seems aware that Shylock is a stubborn man and he is expecting to die as Shylock will get what he wants by law. This creates dramatic tension for the audience as it feels like Antonios death is definite as he doesnt seem to have any hope that he will live, he is simply accepting that he will die from the start of the court scene. Shylock is a solitary figure as he is entering a trial where he is surrounded by Christians that despise him. They use his religion to isolate him; the duke calls for Shylock to enter the court: Go one, and call the Jew into the court. By calling him Jew it conveys the little respect the Christians in the court have for him and emphasises that he is completely alone. He is structured into a sympathetic character as he is completely isolated and he has no one to support him in the trial and therefore it will be harder for him to get his way and take his lethal revenge on Antonio. Dramatic tension builds up as the need for Shylocks mercy is apparent and they are pleading with him; this creates tension as it shows the desperation of the people defending Antonio as they w orry for his life. The duke is asking Shylock for mercy: Glancing an eye upon his losses Enow to press a royal merchant down, and pluck commiseration of his state We all expect a gentle answer, Jew The duke is desperately trying to give Shylock a reason to have mercy, he is listing everything that Antonio has lost and hoping that this will make Shylock think differently about the situation. He is expecting Shylock to have mercy as he calls him a gentle Jew. This suspends the dramatic tension as the audience wait to receive Shylocks response. Shakespeare extends the suspense as to whether Shylock will insist on his bond as he stalls his answer leaving the audience on edge: Youll ask me why I rather choose to have a weight of carrion flesh than to receive three thousand ducats: Ill not answer that. But say its my humour, is it answered? This gives the impression that Shylock is enjoying the power he has as he is using humour to insist on his bond, he is becoming excited with the reality of receiving his bond and is playing with the Christians, leaving them on edge as they await his answer. Merchant of Venice, Act 1 scene 3, Act 2 scene 5 EssayNo one knows exactly what Portia is doing, this adds to the tension as the audience dont know what to expect and they do not understand why she is telling Shylock he can have his bond. This confusion and worry for Antonio in the audience adds to the build up of tension as they do not know what the end result will be, they are expecting a twist of events but they dont know for sure what will happen, this suspense will keep them on edge as they await the final result. The dramatic tension is being built up and prolonged as Portia delays the court: Tarry a little, there is something else, the delay shows that Shylocks desire for revenge; he is very eager and impatient and as he keeps getting interrupted it makes him even more frustrated and impatient to get his revenge. His response to a reasonable request for a surgeon is: tis not in the bond this implies that Shylock wants to get on with it and he is becoming irrational as he wants Antonio dead. His behaviour will affect the audience as they will have less sympathy because he is acting inhumane and irrational and his impatience is becoming obsessive and aggressive. Shakespeare is manipulating the audience as they cannot decide who to feel sorry for as the perception of the characters change throughout the trial scene. At first they might sympathise with Shylock when he is a solitary figure and is called the Jew then they could begin to see him as an inhumane, irrational man who is becoming too obsessive with taking revenge, therefore changing the audiences mind about who to sympathise with. After Antonio gives his poignant speech as he is prepared to die, Shakespeare uses irony and an element of humour to stall the build up of tension. Bassanio says I would lose all, ay sacrifice them all here to this devil, to deliver you. This is ironic as he is saying that he would willingly sacrifice his wife, Portia who is disguised as a lawyer in the scene, to save Antonios life. She responds to this comment: Your wife would give you little thanks for that this hint of humour acts like an interlude that lightens the mood and suspends the build up of dramatic tension for the audience. When Shylocks case is lost Gratiano repetitively uses mocking comments against Shylock: O upright judge! Mark, Jew. O learni d judge! This will make the audience feel a slight sympathy towards Shylock as he is in great pain and the Christians are laughing at his punishment. The audience will either laugh along with this sadistic mockery or feel that it is a mean unnecessary action. Shakespeare uses pathos in this scene to allow the audience to hold a heartfelt sympathy towards Shylock as now the rest of the court including Portia are being irrational and merciless. Portia is being hypocritical and the most ruthless in the trial. Although she gives a speech about the quality of mercy, she has none when she manipulates the court in Antonios favour allowing him to decide a harsh punishment for Shylock. Antonio delivers the punishment: He presently become a Christian all of he dies possessed, unto to his son Lorenzo and his daughter. This example of pathos shows Antonios hatred of Shylock as he is using religion to cause him pain, in order to receive a sadistic pleasure from making him suffer for the rest of his life. The tone of Shylocks voice and the words he uses shows the pain he is feeling by this punishment. Shylock has now been isolated and the way he speaks portrays his depressed emotions: I pray you give me leave to go from hence. I am not well He is using heavy mono-syllabic words in his final speech displaying his despondent feelings and reflecting his exhausted, depressed state of mind. The director of the film of the play uses background music and stage directions to make the viewer feel for Shylock; when he is ordered to become a Christian and give up all he owns the director uses slow, sorrowful music in the background making the viewer empathetic towards Shylock. Shylock also collapses to the ground in complete shock and desperation as he hears his punishment and makes a sound like a wounded animal. This presentation of Shylock makes the viewer pity and sympathise with him as we observe his desperate frustration with the situation, we view him as a tragic figure as his extreme desire for revenge has resulted in a life of grief and depression. During the Elizabethan times the punishment of Shylock at the end of the scene would have been a delightful result. Christians were extremely prejudiced towards Jews at the time so they would not sympathise with Shylock as he loses everything. As he is asked to convert to Christianity, they would feel delight as in that time it would have been thought that the Jew was punished rightly and that he deserved it. However a 21st Century audience would have a slightly different reaction; although some may feel that Shylock deserved to be punished for his inhumane behaviour, a modern audience would be more sympathetic for him as there is more acceptance of different religions now and we would also remember all the trouble Shylock has received that would have driven him to that irrational behaviour. In general, a modern audience would be more shocked by the punishment than an Elizabethan one. Shakespeare cleverly builds up the tension in the trial scene and then he moves straight onto the final scene which is very romantic and humorous, Jessica says: In such a night did young Lorenzo swear he loved her well The audience are almost distracted by this change of atmosphere as everything in the play seems resolved as it finishes on a lighter note. There is also sense of relief at the end as the audience have been building up to the trial scene throughout the whole play, as it was the climax of the play the audience are now more relaxed as there is less suspense. However, the audience are not fully distracted by the happy and romantic conclusion of the play, although everything seems to be resolved the audience will remember the harsh consequence that Shylock received and the way Portia became merciless and irrational in the trial scene. These miserable events will linger in the audiences mind after the play even though the final scene was a happy, romantic one. In conclusion, Shakespeare successfully creates tension in the trial scene by stalling and prolonging the build up of tension which effectively leaves the audience in suspense and keeps them on edge throughout the scene as they struggle decide who to sympathise with in the end.

The Dust Bowl Essays - Dust Bowl, Droughts In The United States

The Dust Bowl The Dust Bowl was the darkest moment in the twentieth-century life of the southern plains, (pg. 4) as described by Donald Worster in his book The Dust Bowl. It was a time of drought, famine, and poverty that existed in the 1930's. It's cause, as Worster presents in a very thorough manner, was a chain of events that was perpetuated by the basic capitalistic society's need for expansion and consumption. Considered by some as one of the worst ecological catastrophes in the history of man, Worster argues that the Dust Bowl was created not by nature's work, but by an American culture that was working exactly the way it was planned. In essence, the Dust Bowl was the effect of a society, which deliberately set out to take all it could from the earth while giving next to nothing back. The Dust Bowl existed, in its full quintessence, concurrently with the Great Depression during the 1930's. Worster sets out in an attempt to show that these two cataclysms existed simultaneously not by coincidence, but by the same culture, which brought them about from similar events. Both events revealed fundamental weaknesses in the traditional culture of America, the one in ecological terms, the other in economic. (pg. 5) Worster proposes that in American society, as in all others, there are certain accepted ways of using the land. He sums up the capital ethos of ecology into three simply stated maxims: nature must be seen as capital, man has a right/obligation to use this capital for constant self-advancement, and the social order should permit and encourage this continual increase of personal wealth (pg. 6) It is through these basic beliefs that Worster claims the plainsmen ignored all environmental limits, much like the brokers and investors on Wall Street ignored a top-heavy e conomy. Worster explains that our business-oriented society began to transform farming into a mass-producing industrial machine, becoming another excess of free enterprise that not even Roosevelt's New Deal could remedy. The dirty thirties, as many called it, was a time when the earth ran amok in southern plains for the better part of a decade. This great American tragedy, which was more devastating environmentally as well as economically than anything in America's past or present, painstakingly tested the spirit of the southern plainsmen. The proud folks of the south refused at first to accept government help, optimistically believing that better days were ahead. Some moved out of the plains, running from not only drought but from the new machine-controlled agriculture. As John Steinbeck wrote in the bestseller The Grapes of Wrath, it was not nature that broke the people-they could handle the drought. It was business farming, seeking a better return on land investments and buying tractors to pursue it, that had broken these people, smashing their identity as natural beings wedded to the land.(pg. 58) The machines, one-crop specialization, non-resident farming, and soil abuse were tangible threats to the American agriculture, but it was the capitalistic economic values behind these land exploitations that drove the plainsmen from their land and created the Dust Bowl. Eventually, after years of drought and dust storms, the plains people had to accept some form of aid or fall to the lowest ranks of poverty in the land, and possibly perish. The government set up agency after agency to try and give federal aid to the plains farmers. Groups such as the Farm Credit Administration, the Works Progress Administration, the Land Utilization Project, and the Agricultural Adjustment program, among others, were formed to give the plainsmen some sort of relief from the hardships of the Dust Bowl. In Cimarron county, Oklahoma 306 households were drawing government relief in June 1934: 60 of them were paid entirely in commodities, the rest mostly in cash (pg. 131). Roosevelt and the government continually contrived ways to give the plains aid, and when the Supreme Court ruled that a certain agency was unconstitutional, Roosevelt simply created another one in its place. In the end, Worster argues, the government agencies did not improve the lot of the large number of poor, marginal farmers, and in fact, none of the federal activities altered much of the factory-like culture of the plains.